I think this is more of a sickness then anything else...

Automated computer systems which manage information away from peering eyes are inherently corruptible because of their predictability along with only a small few people that understand how they work; despite all of the knowledge being in the public domain.

I will focus on this story I read in the early morning hours Tuesday March 14

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060314/ts_nm/iraq_american_dc

In general terms the use of surrogate, news shell organizations is produced to manipulate the ranking of legitimate information. They use similar layouts, systems, and technologies to manage the ranking schemes. As well each site notably is no frills, something of a generic advertisement, and very limited amount of primarily a days worth of content. Please visit the links yourself; the layouts and information are identical.

http://www.localnewsleader.com/brocktown/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=157593
I couldn’t find Brocktown, NV in a google search or a Google Earth search. I can’t find it in google but it has an online news service?

I can find a city with only 20 residents using Google Earth but I can’t find a city with an online news paper?

Link style and information patterns.

These are the links I pulled off of a google search.

http://www.heraldnewsdaily.com/stories/news-00158129.html
http://www.leadingthecharge.com/stories/news-00157593.html
This news agency is not mentioned in the Australian online news listings. A news source from Australia, there will be a test latter on this fact.

http://www.localnewsleader.com/kindred/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=157593
http://www.newsone.ca/piercelandherald/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=157593
http://www.newsone.ca/westfallweeklynews/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=157593
http://localnewsleader.com/jackson/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=157593
http://www.localnewsleader.com/elytimes/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=157593
http://www.localnewsleader.com/olberlin/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=157593
http://www.newsone.ca/westfallweeklynews/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=158129

In most the links provided the reference ID is the same value. All follow a redundant pattern indicating the same logic was used to produce these sites in bulk, the use of the same ID value tells me the reference the same row in a shared data source.


These links are distinctly different from either to the story published on Yahoo, and the stories source Reuters.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyID=2006-03-14T164522Z_01_OLI434593_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-AMERICAN.xml&archived=False

WHOIS Domain lookup

Domain Name: LOCALNEWSLEADER.COM
Registrar: NAMESCOUT CORP
Whois Server: whois.namescout.com
Referral URL: http://www.namescout.com
Name Server: NS1.LOOSEFOOT.COM
Name Server: NS2.LOOSEFOOT.COM
IP 207.195.54.82


Domain Name: newsone.ca
Registry: Canadian Internet Registration Authority - http://www.cira.ca
Registrar: DomainsAtCost Corp. - http://www.domainsatcost.ca
Whois Server: whois.cira.ca
Name Server NS1.LOOSEFOOT.COM 207.195.54.253
Name Server NS2.LOOSEFOOT.COM 207.195.54.254
Updated Date: 29-Jan-2006
Creation Date: 03-Jun-2005
Expiration Date: 03-Jun-2006
IP 207.195.54.74

Domain Name: HERALDNEWSDAILY.COM
Registrar: NAMESCOUT CORP
Whois Server: whois.namescout.com
Referral URL: http://www.namescout.com
Name Server: NS1.LOOSEFOOT.COM
Name Server: NS2.LOOSEFOOT.COM
Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
Updated Date: 03-sep-2005
Creation Date: 03-sep-2005
Expiration Date: 03-sep-2006
IP 207.195.54.74

Domain Name: LEADINGTHECHARGE.COM
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Name Server: NS1.LOOSEFOOT.COM
Name Server: NS2.LOOSEFOOT.COM
Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
Updated Date: 15-jan-2006
Creation Date: 24-jan-2005
Expiration Date: 24-jan-2009
IP 207.195.54.74

These sites despite appearing from different geographical regions share similar address space. What makes this particular factoid interesting is IP addresses are distributed to telecoms in blocks. These addresses are from the same space and likely on the same server.

OrgName: SaskTel
OrgID: SASK
Address: c/o Sasknet Policy
Address: 8th Flr 2121 Saskatchewan Dr
City: Regina
StateProv: SK
PostalCode: S4P-3Y2
Country: CA

NetRange: 207.195.0.0 - 207.195.127.255
CIDR: 207.195.0.0/17
NetName: SASK002

The range or block of addresses belongs to SaskTel a telecom company in Canada.

http://www.sasktel.com

They look the same, served up from the same place, and present the exact same information associated to some places that don't even exist and places that do from all around the world.

There was something else significant about the story I had highlighted. The manner it was reported and then revised, to no one and from no one. Scary if you think we have phantom reporter and phantom “U.S. military spokesman”. Take a second to think about that; WTF are people not taking credit for “revising” such facts?

If you think about what the story originally said it’s quite an accusation. I was lucky enough to have skimmed it in the early morning before it was hacked to crap by nobody of any worth mentioning. It specifically tied the facts “lone US Security Contractor” and “carrying explosives”. So how does that meld with protocol and reality? I don’t believe contractors or anyone is allowed to venture out by themselves. I cannot conceive any reason for a lone contractor to be ferrying around explosives in Iraq? Any legitimate reason would likely have a legitimate military escort one would think; not some lone nameless contractor, being reported by a person without a name, who received their information from someone else who doesn’t have a name either. The only real name on the story is its brand, not much help.

Simply altering stories content doesn’t make it history, but a story that gets broadcast via better channels will. An interesting AP story was released just minutes prior to the American security contractor story being updated. It was titled “Iraq Foils Plot to Put Terrorists at Posts” and what I found most interesting is that it was being reported to the press just that day, but had taken place three weeks prior. As if, now I am speculating, it was sitting on a shelf waiting for it to be needed.

Now this story was distributed through channels that have higher distribution and at greater numbers. Who do you think a news organization for a town that doesn’t exist is for? It’s for show!

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=%22Iraq+foils+plot+to+put+terrorists+at+posts%22&btnG=Search+News

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=&q=%22+American+security+contractor+briefly+held+in+Iraq%22&ie=UTF-8&filter=0

The first link generated a total of 42 results while the second was 12 results. These numbers don’t matter much in the days after a story is reported the damage is quickly done.

This is a primary method of controlling the placement of a story by how many times it is replicated. The automated systems gauge results based on scoring, and a story that gets higher distribution is just going to seem more important then a lesser distributed story. Also what is gauged is the quality of the source, a real city, or regional news organization such as the Modesto Bee’s, or the Oakland Tribune’s reports will score better because they are part of distribution networks.

The shells have are used to generate more results for the story about doing “good” over the unaccountable American security contractor ferrying around explosives all by his lonesome in his car. BTW the choice between an MP5, M16, or an AK47 is not really a choice; but they have distinct signatures when fired.

Some shit stinks too much to just ignore the smell.

I posted my first draft of this on the Conyersblog and another poster was kind enough too look a little deeper and found some other interesting bits out; thank you Reed31463.

It seems that AP didn't first know that it had reported their story, how ever since the AM when I first checked to 5:15pm PST they regained their memory and were hosting it on their own site.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_AL_QAIDA

It is of no real consequence to them other then a terrible sloppy job in self distribution.

Sum it up

Take the two stories I highlighted above, one with a starting distribution of 12 and the other of 42. One with modified facts with no ones name on it. The other takes three weeks until they decide to report about it. One tells a story about good work in stopping a very large gang of saboteurs from infiltrating the Iraqi army in mass, and being caught; a good out come story. The other is a story of a security contractor who was once thought to have been carrying explosives in his car; but then nobody told us otherwise. And besides we still can’t figure out why he was traveling by himself being a US security contractor, with a pair of AK47’s, and something mistaken as explosives?

This is the part that sickens me, disgusts me, and is a disgrace to any proper version of this country that I can recall or imagine. This is also why no one can point it out; people accept labels described by even the moranical in authority, and it’s been the save you ass grenade favorite since 9-1 1 to threaten people with being unpatriotic. Your not being a good “supporter” of the operators who are required to fulfill these actions ordered and described by others shtick. The others are the self described leadership in this country who hide reality and have told many bold lies to move our patriotism to back their desires. We are supposed to choke on their failures with our patriotism, until who has enough?

This story doesn’t make sense no matter how patriotic bull you pile around it. It’s about a contractor by himself ferrying around explosives in Iraq with no military escort, and then suddenly let free. The story was “revised” as incorrectly reported, but yet there is no one to take responsibility for the information and still considered news. How can we trust what we cannot verify?

Fact:

Only three buildings in the history of steal and concrete framed structures are recognized as had completely collapsed in the time it would take a rapid “controlled” demolition to do seemingly the same work. They were all “written off” officially being ruled that “regional fire” located in the upper superstructures “heated” the steal until it gave, leading to a total structural failure.

Fact:

Until these three completely uncharacteristic instances of heat from a carbon fire had only been reached under conditions found in a laboratory environment. From the time the BOTH buildings began to move until they were rubble on the ground was not dissimilar from the time a dropped bowling ball would descend from the same height.

The question:

This is in fact the problem with the whole collapse of these buildings they fell with NO active resistance impeding their collapse; seriously it so implausible it’s not possible the structures had some resistance still in them before they collapsed still freaking standing. To believe these buildings didn’t resist their own weight and that they would fall at speeds of an object without any resistance at all, just doesn’t make much sense.

- posted by Wayne @ 5:07 PM