v : make numb or insensitive
Tuesday, May 31, 2005
 
Concerning "Downing Street Memo"
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/

Add your name to the petition to the president.

Rep. John Conyers online petition here.

Other Downing memo links.

http://home.earthlink.net/~byethetimes/
Saturday, May 28, 2005
 
Take part in history help get rid of Bush
It's time to cut the president and ilk loose.

Take part in American history, don't cower to the likes of the mainstream.

http://rawstory.com/aexternal/conyers_petition_downing_street_527

Add your name and stand behind one of the few real leaders in congress.

Rep. John Conyers

http://www.conyersblog.us
Friday, May 27, 2005
 
Neocons are liars, that's all you really need to know
Has anything this sick sect of our society ever said to get what they want, been found out true?

This is a fundamental question which speaks volumes to reality and the answer is no. I read a report on how much secret material this administration has created and its an astounding quantity of documents.

Now I don’t have a problem with that except there are people in our society who have questions and this Neocon fascist brigade is exploiting their power to avoid them. Unfortunately they can use the system in a manner that avoids its natural checks and balances; lucky us I guess. Well these people sort of make some strong arguments that certain events since the con artists sect of the republican political party has taken power are not what they seem to be.
I thought that in a democracy we had two independent things government and accountability. Not unlike anything else the government cannot be expected to police it self and as we see it’s clearly out of hand.

Back to those questions; see these people despite ridicule by the Neocon zombies have come up with many queries and some theories about this Neocon administration’s actions and behavior. These individuals, who came to power under very suspicious circumstances twice, act as though the world is just peachy and they don’t blink in avoiding the mere acknowledgment that these questions are out there. I have to admit that at fist some of their findings seemed far fetched. Like I said that was only at first, then it sinks in this many plausible problems with the stories related to these events and you know there is an avoidance problem.

I know, I know there has to be proof; well my question is have you really even looked? Or is it easier to call these people nuts and move on to the next criminal action. Naivety is no excuse for the price of our liberty. Knowing what we all know already about the Neocon folk and their combined prior history in this country there is no doubt in my mind that they are more dangerous to the future of the world then any terrorist has been to our country or ever will be.If we don’t stop them soon we will be again in a cold war, a war which feeds wealth and deprives the weakest that are least significant to the wealth. A propaganda war that is about the accumulation of power, not for the sake of liberty for all, but the liberty of those willing to accept what has been defined for them as reality. 8.8 Billion dollars is missing from the reconstruction fund for Iraq, this money was stolen from the fund there is no trace. Remarkably the Yukos Oil Company in Russia whose owner has been in jail was sold for the exact same amount; imagine that I wonder who had 8.8 billion and specifically remained anonymous was? These little quirks are just a sampling of the plethora of information that I have found chasing down my own questions about what kind of person it takes to knowingly get labeled a nut? It is worse then speaking ill of the dead to most people if you mention that you think the leadership of our country has committed multiple acts of treason. It gets even worse after you mention that they intentionally mislead us into multiple wars of aggression. It then becomes about why you are crazy enough to think something like that; is any of this making any sense because it doesn’t to me either.

Why I am crazy enough to think something like this is an important question. The answer is fairly innate to the desire to seek knowledge it’s because someone asked the question, and someone found the answer it’s that simple. I don't think validating reality based on a belief that there are boundaries to your ability to question the world is very wise. It only leaves space for people like the Neocons to exist and without you they can’t.
 
What Bush thinks of America!
Cuckoobananas as himself


Thursday, May 26, 2005
 
Constitutional law expert seeks resolution of inquiry on Iraq
MEMORANDUM
To: Rep. John Conyers, Jr.
From: John C. Bonifaz
Date:
May 22, 2005
RE: The President’s Impeachable Offenses

The recent release of the Downing Street Memo provides new and
compelling evidence that the President of the United States has been
actively engaged in a conspiracy to deceive and mislead the United States
Congress and the American people about the basis for going to war against
Iraq. If true, such conduct constitutes a High Crime under Article II,
Section 4 of the United States Constitution: “The President, Vice President,
and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on
impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes
and misdemeanors.”
In light of the emergence of the Downing Street Memo, Members of Congress should introduce a Resolution of Inquiry directing the House Judiciary Committee to launch a formal investigation into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of epresentatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach George W. Bush, resident of the United States.



TAKE ACTION


Monday, May 16, 2005
 
Burning up the smoking Downing memo
I am disgusted at everyone including myself; we don't deserve the torture provided by our less then free press. I am beginning to believe their freedoms to be suspect to conditions; provided via mechanisms unseen by we the people. After all it is we the people who the information is intended to serve. Oh I might sound a little tin foil but hey it wasn't little ole me who sat for nearly two weeks on the now infamous "Downing Street Memo". The often response from everyone in the days preceding this memo's surface from the murky depths of "For Eyes Only" filed documents has been "What memo?” Not a big surprise I have to dawn a shinny hat in * Co. world because; hey they always have a boogey man. Why not Americans, who ask too many questions? Since questions are bad when your presidency is more like an unopened book, then an open bureaucracy.

My particular disgust comes from my perception that reality exists only in the daily dicing of information that is marketed as news. While it is fact that I can communicate with anyone in the world in a matter of seconds as I did when the memo came out; it takes the information brokers of news longer to figure out what to do with this smoking gun memo. Hell if the intention was to report fact based information they could download the memo, and read it; it is available on the Internet. No, that would be way too over simplified, someone would have to fact check it, make sure the military didn't have a problem with it, and oh yeah wait for the presidents think tanks to come up with a plan. Instead let's play hot potato with it until someone else gets shat on for reporting what * Co. knew 9 months before it had even decided on doing it. The two-week lag time got me thinking.

Right after the British election the American information brokers had their reasons why Mr. Blaire's party had done so poorly in their elections. You know not one, a single one, brokered the information that the election had anything to do with this smoking gun memo released just days before. The memo must not have been in the plan on how they were going to "cover" the election results. It wasn't the case in the European press the memo was front-page headline news throughout the election. It has been reported in the US only to be placed between the pages of the classifieds and Dear Abby where truth dies slowly. This wouldn't have anything to do with the American press being compelled by an un-independent paycheck, and mysteriously never fully investigated Anthrax mailings better known as un-idle threats.

It is funny that it took 2 weeks to come up with an appropriate plan on how to deal. The plan has something to do with the Memo not being accurate, not even original, which means they couldn't kill the messenger, or blame it on the tin foil brigade.

Here is something from my tinfoil pouch, after the cold war what happened to the apparatus that was used to protect those that needed protection from the press? It didn't just cease to exist close up shop and move on to other democracy to subvert; I don't know but likely those who operated it were privatized. Do you think an ex-Director of the CIA in the Whitehouse would know whom they were and what to do with them? Do you think that a compelled media cowers without the existence of a threatening posture adverse to its full freedom? Do you actually think * Co. the supreme leader of America would be allowed to get away with so many failures without one person actually forming a questioning about them? I don’t either.

This is the last thing and I will shut myself up. On the day of the first press conference in the Whitehouse since the release of the memo, there was that airplane which caused the evacuation of the Capitol and the Whitehouse. How is it not important to the president that his wife had to be evacuated from the Whitehouse for her safety? This strikes me as simply being odd that he wasn’t told for 70 minutes that his wife might have been in danger.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
 
Alemeda County Hospitals
http://fixacmc.blogspot.com/2005/05/board-of-trustees-must-get-public.html

Like many ailing County Hospitals the timidity of their boards of Trustees may be what is leaving them under funded. The medical industry as a whole has done a pretty piss poor job ensuring that it will be viable in the near future. Our current leaders are embroiled in a culture that doesn't question the "common knowledge", after all perception of what is common is reality.

It is clear that in order to make bold decisions people need bold ideas. At this point when our medical care industry has more people pushing paper then listening through stethoscopes we are past the point of simply recognizing we have a problem. We know there is a problem we just need people willing to state the hard facts. Then use those facts to both craft and then employ a vision for a viable future.

More here : http://fixacmc.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
 
Why the truth is dead
Link : DU Post

I finally got tired of hearing this brought up and want to show everyone something that I have found out.

There are many reasons individuals are not doing more to fix our problems. The most important thing to remember is everything is questionable but you have to have the strength to actually question it.The strength of an individual is not something that remains consistent through out their lives, nor does it dictate to us the ability to change what is wrong. It is the obstacles that must be overcome in order to create conditions for change.

It has now been 3 days and not one mention of the Bush/Blair wanting to go to Iraq without a proper justification on the AP wire. To believe that something I knew on Saturday has not made it's way onto television news is crazy.

The Jeff Gannon saga brought back memories of our countries earlier obsession with blackmailing our own politicians. A practice that is more then likely still in place today.

The death of Paul Wellstone a champion of the people who we all thought was going to bring positive change.

Then I read this last week.

22. A few members of Congress, notably Senators Daschle (D-SD) and Leahy
(D-VT), briefly resisted the “Patriot Act” with its many unconstitutional
provisions. Messrs. Daschle and Leahy, however, were thereupon sent potentially
fatal dosages of “weaponized” anthrax, from American stores. Congress has been
mostly supine since.

Curiously, and little reported by the media, the first of the half-dozen
fatalities in the October 2001 anthrax attacks was a tabloid newspaper photo
editor from Florida, Robert Stevens. While most Americans probably believe to
this day that these anthrax attacks were the deeds of radical Islamists –
notwithstanding that all evidence points to domestic sources – whom had Mr.
Stevens offended? The answer is that he had offended the Bush family, by
selecting forpublication in the supermarket tabloid that employed him an
mbarrassing photograph of the President’s daughter, Jenna Bush, appearing tipsy
and holding a cigarette, while staggering across a dance floor with a female
friend in a nightclub.And this snip from the times...Times reported:The dry
powder used in the anthrax attacks is virtually indistinguishable in critical
technical respects from that produced by the United States military before it
shut down its biowarfare program, according to federal scientists and military
contractor documents. The similarity to the levels achieved by the United States
military lends support to the idea that someone with ties to the old program may
be behind the attacks that have killed five people. Its high concentration is
surprising, weapon experts said, and far beyond what military analysts once
judged as the likely abilities of terrorists. The anthrax sent to the Senate
contained as many as one trillion spores per gram. If a lethal dose is estimated
conservatively at 10,000 microscopic spores, then a gram in theory could cause
about 100 million deaths. The letter sent to Tom Daschle, the Senate Democratic
leader, is said to have held two grams of anthrax.


We have a press and a government that is walking around on their tiptoes. After being treated like this how would you expect act? In blatant disregard for their own lives, I don't.

I am sure there is more...

The text comes from Rodriguezvs.Bush.pdf
 
The Republican Legacy
"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas.5 Their number is negligible and they are stupid. "

--President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952


http://www.eisenhowermemorial.org/presidential-papers/first-term/documents/1147.cfm
Monday, May 02, 2005
 
Which direction does your politics bend?
http://www.politicalcompass.org
 
-- This must change your world view --
Dr. David Ray Griffith has some important things to say about September 11th.
http://911blogger.fileburst.com/videos/griffin_madison_full_25.wmv
from this blog post
http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html

Liberty comes from knowledge.

Powered by Blogger